Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Maryland

The Arc Baltimore

Baltimore, MD · ~1,117 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Arc Baltimore runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade D.

The Arc Baltimore: 5.4 TCR = 142% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Arc Baltimore safety composite

The Arc Baltimore scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2019

The Arc Baltimore injury rate improved

The Arc Baltimore's TCR fell 1.0 from 5.9 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.9 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 142% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #10/18
  • PHOTO Ottawa Friendship Ho…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 160 inj
  • SIZE ~1,117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ottawa Friendship House, Work Activity Center, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

The Arc Baltimore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Arc Baltimore averages 5.4 TCR (142% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Arc Baltimore TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Arc Baltimore falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 18 Intellectual and developmental employers in Maryland.

The Arc Baltimore (1,117 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Arc Baltimore
The Arc Baltimore (1,117 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

The Arc Baltimore has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.9 4.6 39 3 0
2018 5.4 5.1 58 0 0
2017 5.9 5.7 63 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MD · Baltimore

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ottawa Friendship House, Work Activity Center, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autism Learning Partners Murrieta 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elsbree St 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hughes Network Systems, LLC. 1,115 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDBAL - BALTIMORE 1,113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intrastaff at Johns Hopkins Hospital 1,112 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWI-FLIGHT OPS 1,123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Mansfield Industries Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 3075 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0020 2590 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Durant 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Munoz Rivera Centro de Servicios 1130 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doctors Hospital 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Maine Medical Center 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 1,117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.