Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed · New York

The Children's Home of Kingston

Kingston, NY · ~108 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Children's Home of Kingston runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed workplace, earning a grade D.

The Children's Home of Kingston: 7.0 TCR = 183% of Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Children's Home of Kingston safety composite

The Children's Home of Kingston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2022

The Children's Home of Kingston injury rate improved

The Children's Home of Kingston's TCR fell 1.6 from 6.9 in 2019 to 5.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Kingston, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #104/142
  • PHOTO Connections Individu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Connections Individual and Family Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Children's Home of Kingston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Children's Home of Kingston averages 7.0 TCR (183% of the Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Children's Home of Kingston TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Children's Home of Kingston falls in its industry

1,165 Residential group homes for th establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #104 safest of 142 Residential group homes for th employers in New York.

The Children's Home of Kingston (108 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Children's Home of Kingston
The Children's Home of Kingston (108 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

The Children's Home of Kingston has more employees than the Residential group homes for the emotiona median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2021 8.7 8.7 9 0 0
2019 6.9 6.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · NY · Kingston

1,165 Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 91 employers in Kingston, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Connections Individual and Family Services, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascade Cottage 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestwood Kingsburg Healing Center 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAIN CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreher's Farm Fresh Eggs LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Brewster 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE EBJWJ Management, LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE James E. Fitzgerald, Inc. 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2504 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2504 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingston 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unlimited Care, Inc. Kingston, NY 307 FTE
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Tire Center-Missoula 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversified Interiors El Paso 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn - downtown Johnstown 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City Store #747 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grantsbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Service L.L.C. 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pagel's Ponderosa Dairy LLC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Baseball Inc 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.