Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities · Washington

Cascade Cottage

Centralia, WA · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cascade Cottage runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cascade Cottage: 7.0 TCR = 184% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cascade Cottage safety composite

Cascade Cottage scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cascade Cottage: 5.8 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Cascade Cottage's TCR rose 2.4 from 5.8 in 2023 to 8.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Centralia, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #9/16
  • PHOTO The Children's Home …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Children's Home of Kingston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Cascade Cottage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cascade Cottage averages 7.0 TCR (184% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cascade Cottage TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Cascade Cottage falls in its industry

1,165 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Washington.

Cascade Cottage (104 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cascade Cottage
Cascade Cottage (104 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Cascade Cottage has more employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 8.2 5 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · WA · Centralia

1,165 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 41 employers in Centralia, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Children's Home of Kingston 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connections Individual and Family Services, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestwood Kingsburg Healing Center 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detox 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Pacific Fishing LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Brandt & Sons Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aero Construction 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seattle District 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA646 CENTRALIA HOSPITAL-CENTRALIA HR 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Wolf Lodge - Grand Mound 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR MICHAELS DISTRIBUTION CENTER #2 - CENTRALIA 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michaels Distribution Center #1822 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Rocky Mountain Plumbing Hydroheat Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KPMG Lakehouse 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Specialized Carriers Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stiles Apartments at The Glen 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Source International 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twin Ports Health Services 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Northeastern State Univ 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE california Amforge corporation 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.