Building cleaning services, janitorial · Michigan

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools

Redford, MI · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools: 3.5 TCR = 77% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools safety composite

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2017→2019

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools injury rate improved

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools's TCR fell 10.4 from 10.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Redford, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/114
  • PHOTO Harvard Maintenance …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harvard Maintenance Inc. of Connecticut (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools TCR series: 2017=10.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 4.5

Where The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 114 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Michigan.

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools
The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.4 10.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MI · Redford

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 34 employers in Redford, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc. of Connecticut 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CMMC RUMFORD HOSPITAL EVS 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHEVRON KERN RIVER JANITORIAL 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Fairfield Hospital - EVS 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kitchen Farms, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Farms 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES Filer City Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant Project 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Major Contracting 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redford Service Center 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redford 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daimay North America Automotive Inc 134 FTE
NAT-TCR 1855-INEVA16 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-WIMIL29 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IL026A 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Phoenix Children'S Hosp-Evs 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Seattle 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Houston 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Charlotte 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilldrup Companies - Stafford 164-26 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.