Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · Washington

Victory Packaging Seattle

Auburn, WA · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victory Packaging Seattle runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Victory Packaging Seattle: 4.1 TCR = 186% of Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victory Packaging Seattle safety composite

Victory Packaging Seattle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2019

Victory Packaging Seattle injury rate improved

Victory Packaging Seattle's TCR fell 3.2 from 6.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Auburn, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Bunzl Midatlantic, L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bunzl Midatlantic, LLC (DBA Bunzl Philadelphia) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Victory Packaging Seattle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victory Packaging Seattle averages 4.1 TCR (186% of the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victory Packaging Seattle TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Victory Packaging Seattle falls in its industry

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposab establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Boxes, paperboard and disposab employers in Washington.

Victory Packaging Seattle (30 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Victory Packaging Seattle
Victory Packaging Seattle (30 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Victory Packaging Seattle has fewer employees than the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 6.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · WA · Auburn

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bunzl Midatlantic, LLC (DBA Bunzl Philadelphia) 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bunzl Minneapolis 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Paper Co., Inc. Miami 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forman Equipment 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE El Rancho Bella Vista LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Foods, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOURSE FARMS, INC. - WA 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dixieland Cherries LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA001 4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zones, LLC 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Casino 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Bio-Blood Components - Hammond, IN 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GLC Richmond 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Neill Highway #135 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Orange County - La Habra 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Houston 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Charlotte 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The DM Burr Group - South Redford Schools 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit - 540 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.