Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Victory Packaging Charlotte

Fort Mill, SC · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victory Packaging Charlotte runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Victory Packaging Charlotte: 8.1 TCR = 370% of Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victory Packaging Charlotte safety composite

Victory Packaging Charlotte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Victory Packaging Charlotte: 8.6 → 10.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2019

Victory Packaging Charlotte's TCR rose 2.0 from 8.6 in 2016 to 10.7 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Fort Mill, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 370% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO RJ Schinner Branch 11
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RJ Schinner Branch 11 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Victory Packaging Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victory Packaging Charlotte averages 8.1 TCR (370% of the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victory Packaging Charlotte TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=10.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Victory Packaging Charlotte falls in its industry

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposab establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Boxes, paperboard and disposab employers in South Carolina.

Victory Packaging Charlotte (30 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Victory Packaging Charlotte
Victory Packaging Charlotte (30 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Victory Packaging Charlotte has fewer employees than the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.7 7.1 3 0 0
2018 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2017 6.9 6.9 1 1 0
2016 8.6 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · SC · Fort Mill

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RJ Schinner Branch 11 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnston Paper 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Louisville 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Orlando 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENMARK DISTRICT OFFICE 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood Operations Center 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center - PNG 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR ADA Traffic Control, ltd 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Transfer Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Strattanville 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bermuda Landscape & Design, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Houston 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Seattle 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit - 540 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntsville - 140 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.