Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living

Grand Rapids, MN · ~15 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living: 4.6 TCR = 121% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living safety composite

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2019→2024

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living injury rate improved

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.5 · 2020=12.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Grand Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/240
  • PHOTO The Springs at Happy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~15 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Springs at Happy Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living averages 4.6 TCR (121% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=5.5 · 2020=12.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living (15 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living
The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living (15 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Emeralds At Grand Rapids Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 12.8 6.4 2 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Grand Rapids

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Grand Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Happy Valley 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Oaks AL MC Care Properties, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Touchmark - TEOK 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemont Assisted Living 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CR <eyer - Coleraine 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sota Office 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakdale Office 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4535-1420 15 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clinic & Hospital 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clniic & Hospital 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1609 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1609 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Kosciusko County Government 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Syracuse Feedyard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Avenue I 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Wharton 4.6 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.