Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Nebraska

The Frazier Co.-Main

Omaha, NE · ~67 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Frazier Co.-Main runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

The Frazier Co.-Main: 3.6 TCR = 127% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Frazier Co.-Main safety composite

The Frazier Co.-Main scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Frazier Co.-Main held a steady TCR band

The Frazier Co.-Main's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 127% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #27/49
  • PHOTO AGC Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AGC Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

The Frazier Co.-Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Frazier Co.-Main averages 3.6 TCR (127% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Frazier Co.-Main TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.8

Where The Frazier Co.-Main falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 49 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Nebraska.

The Frazier Co.-Main (67 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Frazier Co.-Main
The Frazier Co.-Main (67 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

The Frazier Co.-Main has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 10.5 0.0 6 0 0
2019 5.1 1.7 3 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NE · Omaha

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AGC Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR J&J Sheet Metal, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FirePro Tech, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salas Plumbing, Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterloo 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&S Plumbing 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electronic Contracting Company - Lincoln 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Flour Mill 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Clackamas Site 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Serum Company 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LGAR Health and Rehabilitation Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Growers Pasta Co. ND 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lee Earley, Inc dba LEi 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewisburg East, OH 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pike Indiana Statewide Operations 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hitz Memorial Home 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.