Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

The Hampton at Salmon Creek

Vancouver, WA · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hampton at Salmon Creek runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Hampton at Salmon Creek: 9.0 TCR = 236% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hampton at Salmon Creek safety composite

The Hampton at Salmon Creek scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2019→2024

The Hampton at Salmon Creek injury rate improved

The Hampton at Salmon Creek's TCR fell 10.7 from 15.2 in 2019 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=15.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Vancouver, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 236% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/109
  • PHOTO The Village of East …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Village of East Harbor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

The Hampton at Salmon Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hampton at Salmon Creek averages 9.0 TCR (236% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hampton at Salmon Creek TCR series: 2019=15.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Hampton at Salmon Creek falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

The Hampton at Salmon Creek (59 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hampton at Salmon Creek
The Hampton at Salmon Creek (59 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Hampton at Salmon Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.9 2.2 3 1 0
2021 16.6 7.1 4 3 0
2020 8.6 0.0 4 0 0
2019 15.2 2.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Vancouver

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 490 employers in Vancouver, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Village of East Harbor 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Germantown 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Lancaster Village 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Village North - Sherwood 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE John I. Haas, Inc. - Warehouse Division 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Solar 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Concrete LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHG Building Systems, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Senior Living 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Medical Center Main Campus 3,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR 600 1,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Sherburne County Public Works - Highway Maintenance 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Goshen 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1237 - Bozeman 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Ventura 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE F&J Fernandez Contracting 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida Kenworth - Orlando 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hennepin County Medical Center - Jail Health Services 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennsauken 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.