Family social service agencies · Minnesota
The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing
Minneapolis, MN · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 18.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing runs at 479% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Family social service agencies workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 18.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 12
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's OSHA Total Case Rate of 18.2 to the Family social service agencies BLS benchmark of 3.8 (479% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Where The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing falls in its industry
1,289 Family social service agencies establishmentsSafer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 87 Family social service agencies employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing
Between 2022 and 2024, The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's Total Case Rate improved from 14.7 to 7.5 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 49% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 7.5, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 32.4, a spread of 24.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing recorded 12 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 12 injuries, 3 illnesses shown on this page for The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 624190 - Family social service agencies.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 53,225 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing (this establishment) | 18.19 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Individual and family social services, multi-purpose industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 624190 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 9 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 3 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 32.4 | 7.2 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| 2022 | 14.7 | 3.7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's reported OSHA injury record versus its Family social service agencies peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 479% of the Family social service agencies benchmark, The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Family social service agencies sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's safety grade?
How many injuries has The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Minneapolis - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~18.2)
Similar size (~45 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.