Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing · Georgia

The Home City Ice Company College Park

Atlanta, GA · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Home City Ice Company College Park runs at 300% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

The Home City Ice Company College Park: 9.9 TCR = 300% of Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Home City Ice Company College Park safety composite

The Home City Ice Company College Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Home City Ice Company College Park held a steady TCR band

The Home City Ice Company College Park's TCR held near 0.3 from 12.6 in 2022 to 12.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.6 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312113 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 300% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Brush
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brush (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Home City Ice Company College Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Home City Ice Company College Park averages 9.9 TCR (300% of the Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Home City Ice Company College Park TCR series: 2022=12.6 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=12.3 · BLS 3.3

Where The Home City Ice Company College Park falls in its industry

93 Ice (except dry ice) manufactu establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Ice (except dry ice) manufactu employers in Georgia.

The Home City Ice Company College Park (29 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Home City Ice Company College Park
The Home City Ice Company College Park (29 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 8.0

The Home City Ice Company College Park has fewer employees than the Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.3 0.0 3 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 12.6 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312113 · GA · Atlanta

93 Ice (except dry ice) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brush 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Home City Ice Company Doraville 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Home City Ice Company St. Louis 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reddy Ice - Gaffney (435) 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR LAS-INFLIGHT 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Joule Dallas 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - Bellevue 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ameriflight, LLC LAN 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE OmniSource, LLC. - Mansfield 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bravera Health Spring Hill Regional Hospital - EVS 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.