Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

The Inn at Orchard Park

Bucyrus, OH · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Inn at Orchard Park runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Inn at Orchard Park: 10.0 TCR = 263% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Inn at Orchard Park safety composite

The Inn at Orchard Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−41.3

2022→2024

The Inn at Orchard Park injury rate improved

The Inn at Orchard Park's TCR fell 41.3 from 57.1 in 2022 to 15.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 57.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=57.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=15.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bucyrus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 263% of ind

  • DART 15.8 DART
  • RANK #201/243
  • PHOTO Spectrum Health Comp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spectrum Health Companies Brainerd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Inn at Orchard Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Inn at Orchard Park averages 10.0 TCR (263% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Inn at Orchard Park TCR series: 2022=57.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Inn at Orchard Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

The Inn at Orchard Park (33 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Inn at Orchard Park
The Inn at Orchard Park (33 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Inn at Orchard Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 15.8 4 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2022 57.1 57.1 2 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Bucyrus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 43 employers in Bucyrus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies Brainerd 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at San Juan Capistrano 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Crest Assisted Living 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Summer Ridge 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Foertmeyer & Sons Greenhouse 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 1 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes-Wayne Electric Cooperative, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Philadelphia Service Building 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR IB Tech 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bucyrus Community Hospital 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bucyrus 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legacy Lighting : Bucyrus, OH 351 FTE
NAT-TCR Window World Belchertown 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Health Association of Niagara County Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Schmitz Timber Management Inc. Co. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ivy Park at San Juan Capistrano 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allegheny Structural Components 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Farms- Falls Church, VA 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle Maintenance Horizon 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Building Restoration Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.