Sewage Treatment Facilities · New Jersey

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority

Jersey City, NJ · ~306 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewage Treatment Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority: 3.8 TCR = 313% of Sewage Treatment Facilities BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority safety composite

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority: 3.5 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority's TCR rose 1.4 from 3.5 in 2022 to 4.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Jersey City, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 313% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO El Estero Water Reso…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Estero Water Resource Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority averages 3.8 TCR (313% of the Sewage Treatment Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 1.2

Where The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority falls in its industry

400 Sewage Treatment Facilities establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Sewage Treatment Facilities employers in New Jersey.

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority (306 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority
The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority (306 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority has more employees than the Sewage Treatment Facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 11 0 0
2023 2.8 2.4 6 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · NJ · Jersey City

400 Sewage Treatment Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 167 employers in Jersey City, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Estero Water Resource Center 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Lake Superior Sanitary District 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Bay Municipal Utility District - Wastewater 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moccasin Bend Wastewater Treatment 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Corp. 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE IEW Construction Group 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Holly Main Campus 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Beverage Packers, LLC 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuehne + Nagel Inc CL 3,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jersey City Medical Center 2,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuehne + Nagel Inc SAL 2,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR 333869-NEW JERSEY NDC 2,118 FTE
NAT-TCR universal forest products dallas 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PHMG Peace Harbor Clinics 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Davenport Store 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peace Harbor Hospital Main Campus 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAC 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beckett Thermal Solutions North Ridgeville 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barentz North America, LLC. 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.