Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · New Jersey

IEW Construction Group

Hamilton, NJ · ~306 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IEW Construction Group runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

IEW Construction Group: 3.2 TCR = 115% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IEW Construction Group safety composite

IEW Construction Group scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

IEW Construction Group held a steady TCR band

IEW Construction Group's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.3 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Hamilton, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 115% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #40/73
  • PHOTO Stark Pavement Corpo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stark Pavement Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

IEW Construction Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IEW Construction Group averages 3.2 TCR (115% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IEW Construction Group TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where IEW Construction Group falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 73 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in New Jersey.

IEW Construction Group (306 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate IEW Construction Group
IEW Construction Group (306 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

IEW Construction Group has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 2.5 13 0 0
2019 2.7 1.4 10 0 0
2018 3.0 1.0 9 0 0
2017 3.9 3.5 10 0 0
2016 3.3 1.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NJ · Hamilton

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 85 employers in Hamilton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stark Pavement Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beck St 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Saginaw Paving Co. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niles, Mi 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Corp. 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Holly Main Campus 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Beverage Packers, LLC 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR RWJ University Hospital at Hamilton 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allies, Inc. 883 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJTRN - TRENTON 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRENTON (NJTRN) 485 FTE
NAT-TCR Tramec Sloan Holland 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Central States Enterprises New haven In. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hga20-Bfspr-Gaithersburg Holiday Inn 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Isanti Primary 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hood Container of Louisiana 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priebe Security Services 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City, Missouri 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.