Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · South Carolina

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston

Charleston, SC · ~89 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade F.

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston: 6.4 TCR = 213% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston safety composite

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston: 1.5 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston's TCR rose 9.7 from 1.5 in 2023 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 213% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #107/138
  • PHOTO Loews Royal Pacific …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Loews Royal Pacific Resort (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lindy Renaissance Charleston averages 6.4 TCR (213% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston TCR series: 2023=1.5 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.0

Where The Lindy Renaissance Charleston falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 138 Hotel management services (i.e employers in South Carolina.

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston (89 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lindy Renaissance Charleston
The Lindy Renaissance Charleston (89 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 9.3 6 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · SC · Charleston

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Loews Royal Pacific Resort 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilton Garden Inn 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Orleans French Quarter 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CY Delk Hospitality Partners LLC. 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Greenville 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lanxess 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville, SC - Asheville, NC HVAC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yemassee SC Truss 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Titan Stone 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FC: Ontario 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosenbauer Motors LLC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jet Midwest 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Bayshore 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelly Generator & Equipment, Inc. 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca Rio Grande Regional 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Morning Star Trucking Company 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.