Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

The Living Center of Concord

Concord, NC · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Living Center of Concord runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Living Center of Concord: 1.7 TCR = 45% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Living Center of Concord safety composite

The Living Center of Concord scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2022→2024

The Living Center of Concord injury rate improved

The Living Center of Concord's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Concord, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/356
  • PHOTO StoneBridge Olney
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: StoneBridge Olney (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Living Center of Concord in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Living Center of Concord averages 1.7 TCR (45% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Living Center of Concord TCR series: 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Living Center of Concord falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

The Living Center of Concord (29 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Living Center of Concord
The Living Center of Concord (29 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Living Center of Concord has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Concord

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR StoneBridge Olney 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor House Reminisce 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poet's Walk Round Rock 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Crossing 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - NCC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Sandhill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cowans Ford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craven County Wood Energy 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR HORIBA Automotive Troy 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Three Rivers Health and Rehabilitation 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamestown Store 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepsi Bottling of La Grande 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pasco Horizon 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heidtman Steel Products Inc. -Front Street 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-MA-Norwell-98 Accord Park Dr 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 39687 - Imlay City 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.