Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

The Mansion at Rosemont

Rosemont, PA · ~104 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Mansion at Rosemont runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Mansion at Rosemont: 7.4 TCR = 195% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Mansion at Rosemont safety composite

The Mansion at Rosemont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2020→2024

The Mansion at Rosemont injury rate improved

The Mansion at Rosemont's TCR fell 1.9 from 6.4 in 2020 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rosemont, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 195% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #115/233
  • PHOTO 10312
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10312 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Mansion at Rosemont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Mansion at Rosemont averages 7.4 TCR (195% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Mansion at Rosemont TCR series: 2020=6.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Mansion at Rosemont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

The Mansion at Rosemont (104 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Mansion at Rosemont
The Mansion at Rosemont (104 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Mansion at Rosemont has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 2.2 4 0 0
2023 5.3 1.8 3 0 0
2022 15.3 10.9 7 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Rosemont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Rosemont, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10312 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10532 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Grandon Farms 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Marysville 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soergel Orchards2 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Philadelphia 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles J. Merlo Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Eagle Construction Co. Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Edmond's Home for Children 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR theVillage 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosemont Presbyterian Village 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7491-ENPHG-ROSEMONT COLLEGE 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Chapel Restaurant, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR A+ Insulation 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Martins Ferry 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PCA1 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arctic Fjord, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fred M. Schiavone Construction, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby County 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE BJC Behavioral Health - North division 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.