Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Rosemont Presbyterian Village

Rosemont, PA · ~88 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosemont Presbyterian Village runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Rosemont Presbyterian Village: 6.4 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosemont Presbyterian Village safety composite

Rosemont Presbyterian Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.8

2016→2019

Rosemont Presbyterian Village injury rate improved

Rosemont Presbyterian Village's TCR fell 12.8 from 14.7 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.7 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rosemont, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 167% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #96/233
  • PHOTO Abbington of Powell
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abbington of Powell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rosemont Presbyterian Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosemont Presbyterian Village averages 6.4 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosemont Presbyterian Village TCR series: 2016=14.7 · 2017=7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Rosemont Presbyterian Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Rosemont Presbyterian Village (88 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosemont Presbyterian Village
Rosemont Presbyterian Village (88 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rosemont Presbyterian Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 7.0 3.5 4 0 0
2016 14.7 3.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Rosemont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Rosemont, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abbington of Powell 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HallKeen Assisted Living 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Manor 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheville Walden Ridge 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JA Myers Bldg & Dev., Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Norwood Company 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Ross Brothers Construction, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE D & M Contracting Inc 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Edmond's Home for Children 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR theVillage 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Mansion at Rosemont 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7491-ENPHG-ROSEMONT COLLEGE 21 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-Abs 0028 0745 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TN 1794 Old Gray Station Rd 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0020 3608 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 0956 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE John W Vaughan Transmission Building 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30236 - Capstone Kroger Salem Va 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops 248 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Junction WECO 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.