Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

The Pines Assisted Living

Name: The Pines Assisted Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Richfield, MN · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pines Assisted Living runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Pines Assisted Living: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pines Assisted Living safety composite

The Pines Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2022→2023

The Pines Assisted Living injury rate improved

The Pines Assisted Living's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Richfield, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #12/226
PHOTO Grand Lodge
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grand Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.8
Grand Lodge

1.8
Chisolm Trail

1.8
Cedar Ridge

1.8
Dominion Senio

1.8

What this shows The Pines Assisted Living averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

The Pines Assisted Living TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Pines Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Pines Assisted Living (47 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Pines Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	3.6	0.0	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Richfield

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in Richfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Grand Lodge	LINCOLN, NE	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chisolm Trail of Keene Senior Living	KEENE, TX	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cedar Ridge	BURLINGTON, NC	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dominion Senior Living of Anderson	ANDERSON, SC	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Staples	STAPLES	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Campbell	TINTAH	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Willmar Live Haul	WILLMAR	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative	AITKIN	47 FTE
CITY-NEAR	900010	Richfield	6,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2300 - Richfield	Richfield	549 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Richfield Best Buy Office Bldg	Richfield	504 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1828 RICHFIELD 7601 PENN AVE BLDG	Richfield	501 FTE
NAT-TCR	Dallas Progressive	Duncanville, TX	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Merchandisers	Irving, TX	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	J & J Worldwide Services	Austin, TX	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	International Paper - Port Wentworth Mill	Port Wentworth, GA	1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Cental Office	Troy, MI	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Munro	Grand Junction, CO	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fab Steel - Flannery	Baton Rouge, LA	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hendrick Medical Plaza	Abilene, TX	47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.