Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard · Ohio

The Piqua Paper Box Co.

Piqua, OH · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Piqua Paper Box Co. runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

The Piqua Paper Box Co.: 3.5 TCR = 107% of Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Piqua Paper Box Co. safety composite

The Piqua Paper Box Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

The Piqua Paper Box Co. injury rate improved

The Piqua Paper Box Co.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Piqua, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO K&D Graphics
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K&D Graphics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Piqua Paper Box Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Piqua Paper Box Co. averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Piqua Paper Box Co. TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where The Piqua Paper Box Co. falls in its industry

205 Folding paper and paperboard c establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Folding paper and paperboard c employers in Ohio.

The Piqua Paper Box Co. (23 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Piqua Paper Box Co.
The Piqua Paper Box Co. (23 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

The Piqua Paper Box Co. has fewer employees than the Folding paper and paperboard containers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · OH · Piqua

205 Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 65 employers in Piqua, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K&D Graphics 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Falls SD - D Avenue 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foodservice : ST CHARLES 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Logic West Lake 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MID EAST PRODUCTION LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlessman Seed Co 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCN Holdings Inc dba Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evenflo Company 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps and Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps & Systems Piqua 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3765 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Lancaster Office 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Park High School Dist 108 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Higashi Farms, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Two Rivers 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iron Mountain Pumping Plant 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mar Vista Gardens 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine Course Hospitality Group - Waterville Hampton Inn 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kmi International Inc 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.