Housing authorities operating residential buildings · California

Mar Vista Gardens

Culver City, CA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mar Vista Gardens runs at 488% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Housing authorities operating residential buildings workplace, earning a grade F.

Mar Vista Gardens: 6.8 TCR = 488% of Housing authorities operating residential buildings BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mar Vista Gardens safety composite

Mar Vista Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mar Vista Gardens: 0.0 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 19.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Mar Vista Gardens's TCR rose 5.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Culver City, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 488% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #83/113
  • PHOTO Ballston Park
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ballston Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mar Vista Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mar Vista Gardens averages 6.8 TCR (488% of the Housing authorities operating residential buildings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mar Vista Gardens TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=19.9 · 2023=5 · 2024=5 · BLS 1.4

Where Mar Vista Gardens falls in its industry

1,100 Housing authorities operating establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 113 Housing authorities operating employers in California.

Mar Vista Gardens (23 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mar Vista Gardens
Mar Vista Gardens (23 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Mar Vista Gardens has fewer employees than the Housing authorities operating residentia median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2023 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 19.9 10.0 4 0 0
2021 10.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 8.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · CA · Culver City

1,100 Housing authorities operating residential buildings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 94 employers in Culver City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ballston Park 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westgate Apartments Ltd 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GULFSTREAM HARBOR I & II 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living at Kennewick 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sony Pictures Entertainment 3,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 567 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Culver City / Westside 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - CULVER CITY 1,032 FTE
NAT-TCR Law Enforcement Center 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Utah 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Norton Women's and Children's Hospital NWCH 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Presque Isle Electric & Gas Coop 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maine Course Hospitality Group - Waterville Hampton Inn 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Piqua Paper Box Co. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kmi International Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.P. Gasway Company, Inc 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.