Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · Maryland

The Surgery Center of Easton

Easton, MD · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Surgery Center of Easton runs at 315% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade F.

The Surgery Center of Easton: 12.0 TCR = 315% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Surgery Center of Easton safety composite

The Surgery Center of Easton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Surgery Center of Easton: 0.0 → 23.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 23.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

The Surgery Center of Easton's TCR rose 23.9 from 0.0 in 2023 to 23.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Easton, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 315% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO Hanover Surgicenter …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanover Surgicenter LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

The Surgery Center of Easton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Surgery Center of Easton averages 12.0 TCR (315% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Surgery Center of Easton TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=23.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Surgery Center of Easton falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in Maryland.

The Surgery Center of Easton (20 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Surgery Center of Easton
The Surgery Center of Easton (20 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

The Surgery Center of Easton has fewer employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · MD · Easton

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 72 employers in Easton, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanover Surgicenter LLC 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Surgical Center 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ophthalmology Surgery Center of Dallas 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Physicians Surgery Center 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hurlock Hatchery #26 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perryman Station 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aberdeen Proving Grounds 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockville Station 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Easton 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement Life Communities - Bayleigh Chase 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aphena Pharma Solutions - Industrial Park Road 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shore Bancshares Inc 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Wes Olson Trucking Inc 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Everett Wa - 331 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 916 Sby73 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Laredo Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkdale Mills, Inc Plant 52 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wellington at Conroe 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raintree 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.