Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · South Carolina

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Florence, SC · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo Fisher Scientific runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Thermo Fisher Scientific: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo Fisher Scientific safety composite

Thermo Fisher Scientific scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Thermo Fisher Scientific: 1.7 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2023

Thermo Fisher Scientific's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.7 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Florence, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO Building 2033
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building 2033 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Thermo Fisher Scientific in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo Fisher Scientific averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo Fisher Scientific TCR series: 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo Fisher Scientific falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in South Carolina.

Thermo Fisher Scientific (115 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo Fisher Scientific
Thermo Fisher Scientific (115 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Thermo Fisher Scientific has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 2.9 4 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · SC · Florence

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 208 employers in Florence, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building 2033 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascent Pharmaceuticals 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DDS Caribbean Corp. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ONY Biotech 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.B. Guimarin & Co Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Georgetown Container 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4176 Greer Sheet Plant 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORBIS Packaging 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Regional Medical Center 3,889 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD REG MED CTR OF PEE DEE MH101 3,883 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES MH104 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Physician Associates II 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR NAGL Manufacturing 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trackonomy Systems, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Connor Distributing- White River Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Siemens Industry. Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold Crown Nursery, LLC 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Modified Fiber 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marian Manor HealthCare Center 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluid Connectors : Lewisburg TFD W 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.