Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing · Michigan

Thread-Craft, Inc.

Sterling Heights, MI · ~54 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thread-Craft, Inc. runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Thread-Craft, Inc.: 8.8 TCR = 268% of Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thread-Craft, Inc. safety composite

Thread-Craft, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2016→2023

Thread-Craft, Inc. injury rate improved

Thread-Craft, Inc.'s TCR fell 13.3 from 13.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.3 · 2017=18.8 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Sterling Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 268% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/42
  • PHOTO Moore Industries
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moore Industries (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Thread-Craft, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thread-Craft, Inc. averages 8.8 TCR (268% of the Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thread-Craft, Inc. TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2017=18.8 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=0 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thread-Craft, Inc. falls in its industry

448 Metal casting machinery and eq establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 42 Metal casting machinery and eq employers in Michigan.

Thread-Craft, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Thread-Craft, Inc.
Thread-Craft, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Thread-Craft, Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal casting machinery and equipment ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 12.3 8.8 7 0 0
2018 12.3 3.5 7 0 0
2017 18.8 11.3 10 0 0
2016 13.3 13.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Sterling Heights

448 Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moore Industries 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Machine Co. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lidworks 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Residential Home Builder 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalamazoo Facility 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE LS Brinker 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Operations-319 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR Darigold Bozeman Plant 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Beach Plum IRA - 16 Beach Plum Ln - Middle Island 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Gardeners, Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cippco Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Empire Distribution Systems. Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Don Moorhead Construction, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Queens Village Work Location-NYAK 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.