Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Tithonus Bulter

Butler, PA · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tithonus Bulter runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Tithonus Bulter: 7.4 TCR = 114% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tithonus Bulter safety composite

Tithonus Bulter scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Tithonus Bulter injury rate improved

Tithonus Bulter's TCR fell 4.6 from 7.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 31.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=31.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Butler, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.4 · 114% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #369/754
  • PHOTO The Nursing Center a…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Nursing Center at Little Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tithonus Bulter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tithonus Bulter averages 7.4 TCR (114% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tithonus Bulter TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=31 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Tithonus Bulter falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #369 safest of 754 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Pennsylvania.

Tithonus Bulter (86 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tithonus Bulter
Tithonus Bulter (86 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Tithonus Bulter has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 31.0 31.0 2 19 0
2019 6.4 6.4 4 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2017 8.2 8.2 5 0 0
2016 7.9 7.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Butler

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 97 employers in Butler, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Nursing Center at Little Creek 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LP Pine Knot, LLC--McCreary Co 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Neuse Group, LLC d/b/a Cherry Point Bay Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestview Health & Rehab 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CT Bartoli Mushrooms, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Power Labs 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luzerne Service Building 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 908-NiSource-Canonsburg-SPT PA 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Butler Memorial Hospital 1,665 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK Steel - Butler Works 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifesteps, Inc. 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1885 481 FTE
NAT-TCR San Eli Supermarket 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR South Gate 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Hospital - St. Charles 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hart EMC, Hartwell Office 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc. WV Hanger 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frontier Bridge 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mike Savoie Chevrolet 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE 34 Recc 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.