Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers · Michigan

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills

Auburn Hills, MI · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills: 1.0 TCR = 45% of Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills safety composite

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2023→2024

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills injury rate improved

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424610 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO GARLAND TEXAS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GARLAND TEXAS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills averages 1.0 TCR (45% of the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills TCR series: 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills falls in its industry

101 Foam, plastics, resins and sha establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Foam, plastics, resins and sha employers in Michigan.

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills (50 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills
tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills (50 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.1

tk Engineered Plastics - Auburn Hills has more employees than the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merch median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424610 · MI · Auburn Hills

101 Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GARLAND TEXAS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composites One LLC - Lakeland 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composites One LLC - Rock Hill 465 E Springdale 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regional Distribution Center 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lapeer County EMS Station Five - ST5 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waupaca Foundry - Plant 1 OS Michigan 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecumseh Place 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clear Blue Logistics LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Trulite Glass & Aluminum 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Joy Global Underground Mining LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartwig Plumbing & Heating Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The First National Bank in Sioux Falls 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rosalia Restaurant 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uptown Fleet, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Library Way 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wpc-Twc-Twc Wpc - Peoria Az 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.