Administrative management consulting services · Texas

TMF Health Quality Institute

Austin, TX · ~239 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TMF Health Quality Institute runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Administrative management consulting services workplace, earning a grade D.

TMF Health Quality Institute: 0.8 TCR = 150% of Administrative management consulting services BLS 0.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TMF Health Quality Institute safety composite

TMF Health Quality Institute scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2024

TMF Health Quality Institute injury rate improved

TMF Health Quality Institute's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541611 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 150% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Ark Post Acute Netwo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ark Post Acute Network, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

TMF Health Quality Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TMF Health Quality Institute averages 0.8 TCR (150% of the Administrative management consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TMF Health Quality Institute TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where TMF Health Quality Institute falls in its industry

128 Administrative management cons establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Administrative management cons employers in Texas.

TMF Health Quality Institute (239 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate TMF Health Quality Institute
TMF Health Quality Institute (239 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3

TMF Health Quality Institute has more employees than the Administrative management consulting ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2022 2.7 0.6 4 1 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.7 0.3 2 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541611 · TX · Austin

128 Administrative management consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ark Post Acute Network, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaiser Group Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Media Mosaic Inc. DBA The Mosaic Company 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GAP Solutions, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Pipeline Services 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Valero-Port Arthur 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCR Contractors, LLC 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-Mira Loma Substation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Chino Substation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryan Gootee General Contractors, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Red Wing Shoe Co. Potosi 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Longveiw Lumber 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCAR Inc. 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyhbr - Scs-Hebron Bldg K - 2741 239 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.