General warehousing and storage · Utah

Tosca - Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, UT · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tosca - Salt Lake City runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Tosca - Salt Lake City: 4.7 TCR = 80% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tosca - Salt Lake City safety composite

Tosca - Salt Lake City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Tosca - Salt Lake City injury rate improved

Tosca - Salt Lake City's TCR fell 4.9 from 6.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 80% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #59/89
  • PHOTO ODW Logistics - Ric1
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ODW Logistics - Ric1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Tosca - Salt Lake City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tosca - Salt Lake City averages 4.7 TCR (80% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tosca - Salt Lake City TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Tosca - Salt Lake City falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 89 General warehousing and storag employers in Utah.

Tosca - Salt Lake City (41 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tosca - Salt Lake City
Tosca - Salt Lake City (41 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Tosca - Salt Lake City has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 9.3 9.3 5 0 0
2022 6.2 4.1 3 0 0
2021 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.1 10.1 3 0 0
2017 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 6.7 6.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · UT · Salt Lake City

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ODW Logistics - Ric1 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19110010-001090 USWHS VEYER-PLYMOUTH,MN 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Pomona 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BUD MAHAS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Rock Concrete 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harv & Higam Masonry 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Wulff - Ohio 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR H & R Agripower - Russellville 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Louis Children's Hospital 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Erlanger CIN 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixon Automatic Tool, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hancock Wood Electric Cooperative, Inc. ( North Baltimore) 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgerton Trucking, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanphere Enterprises / Corporate 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.