Community recreation programs, government · Connecticut

Town of Enfield Recreation Department

Enfield, CT · ~14 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Town of Enfield Recreation Department runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade A.

Town of Enfield Recreation Department: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Town of Enfield Recreation Department safety composite

Town of Enfield Recreation Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Town of Enfield Recreation Department held a steady TCR band

Town of Enfield Recreation Department's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Enfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/28
  • PHOTO City Hall - Communit…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~14 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Hall - Community Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Town of Enfield Recreation Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Town of Enfield Recreation Department averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Town of Enfield Recreation Department TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Town of Enfield Recreation Department falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 28 Community recreation programs, employers in Connecticut.

Town of Enfield Recreation Department (14 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Town of Enfield Recreation Department
Town of Enfield Recreation Department (14 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Town of Enfield Recreation Department has fewer employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CT · Enfield

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 106 employers in Enfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Hall - Community Development 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EI088 - Lake City Office 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fig Plaza 3rd floor 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington State Dept of Natural Resources - Division 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Water Pollution Control Facility 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Pollution 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLOOMFIELD CT OFFICE 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rain CII Carbon - Stamford 14 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 41 - Hartford 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 41 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12131 346 FTE
NAT-TCR The People Concern - Cloverfield 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Conowingo 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CoorsTek Igniter Products 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc 1.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.