Grocery Store · California

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco

San Francisco, CA · ~161 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco runs at 515% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Grocery Store workplace, earning a grade F.

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco: 17.5 TCR = 515% of Grocery Store BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco safety composite

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco: 11.1 → 18.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 34.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco's TCR rose 7.3 from 11.1 in 2017 to 18.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 34.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 515% of ind

  • DART 13.8 DART
  • RANK #4424/4686
  • PHOTO Trader Joe's 0525 Da…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 102 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trader Joe's 0525 Danbury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco averages 17.5 TCR (515% of the Grocery Store BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco TCR series: 2017=11.1 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=21.3 · 2022=34.2 · 2023=19.3 · 2024=18.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery Store establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4424 safest of 4686 Grocery Store employers in California.

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco (161 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco
Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco (161 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Trader Joe's 0236 San Francisco has more employees than the Grocery Store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.4 13.8 15 5 0
2023 19.3 15.6 11 10 0
2022 34.2 29.0 17 16 0
2021 21.3 16.8 15 4 0
2020 11.7 5.3 11 0 0
2019 12.4 8.0 14 0 0
2018 11.7 8.8 8 4 0
2017 11.1 9.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · CA · San Francisco

30,654 Grocery Store employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0525 Danbury 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0756 Little Rock 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 1449 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0624 Pittsburgh 17.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Valle Sabbia, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Espinal FLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Avocado Corporation 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-SONGS Station 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0525 Danbury 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0756 Little Rock 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1449 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Casella Waste Systems - Belmont 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE S03422 - West Louisville Hauling 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE S06766 - RAA - Elkridge 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05499 - Reuters Recycling 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.