Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing · Texas

Trinity tank Car Plant 200

Longview, TX · ~104 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Trinity tank Car Plant 200: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 safety composite

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trinity tank Car Plant 200: 0.8 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Trinity tank Car Plant 200's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.8 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Longview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/21
  • PHOTO Alliance, NE (EMD)
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliance, NE (EMD) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity tank Car Plant 200 averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 TCR series: 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Trinity tank Car Plant 200 falls in its industry

208 Brakes and parts for railroad establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 21 Brakes and parts for railroad employers in Texas.

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 (104 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity tank Car Plant 200
Trinity tank Car Plant 200 (104 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Trinity tank Car Plant 200 has more employees than the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling st median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · TX · Longview

208 Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliance, NE (EMD) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sherman Tx Trackwork 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Tank Car - Plant 1200 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oncor SOSF 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE JASPER NEWTON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Carlos Location 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE SLSCO 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Unique Thrift Store - 127kndy 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Corn Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Planning and Development Services 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Aldrich Chemical Co LLC - Teutonia Lab 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northeastern Envelope Company 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPI Noti 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elliot Construction Corporation 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE MC Contracting 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.