Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · California

Tru-Form Industries, Inc.

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~83 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Tru-Form Industries, Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. safety composite

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2018→2019

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Tru-Form Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Nucor-LMP
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor-LMP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tru-Form Industries, Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tru-Form Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in California.

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tru-Form Industries, Inc.
Tru-Form Industries, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Tru-Form Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor-LMP 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jemison Metals LYN 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAO : Shalmet 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish Nebraska 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Tree 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryder Fruitland ID. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32311 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #613 (Winneconne, WI) 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ES3 LLC : York, PA (FDC) 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE VIP Cinema Plant 6 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE VIP Structures 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Package Design and Mfg 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.