Electric power distribution systems · Arizona

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D)

Tucson, AZ · ~530 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade C.

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D): 1.4 TCR = 114% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) safety composite

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) held a steady TCR band

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #19/52
  • PHOTO Lansing SC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~530 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lansing SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) averages 1.4 TCR (114% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 52 Electric power distribution sy employers in Arizona.

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) (530 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D)
Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) (530 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Tucson Electric Power (Energy Delivery/T&D) has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.5 0.8 9 0 0
2018 1.1 0.5 6 0 0
2017 1.2 0.5 7 0 0
2016 1.7 0.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Tucson

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lansing SC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gallatin Department of Electricity 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUFKIN SVC CTR 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monongahela Power Company 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carvana Tolleson 529 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Buckeye 529 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC-COTA Cadets 528 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Contract Manufacturing. Phoenix 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR HPASC01 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharp Energy - Georgetown 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Moen-Las Vegas 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Boca Raton 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE James Construction I&M Division 530 FTE
NAT-SIZE GROB Bluffton 530 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lci - 228 530 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Medical Center - West Lake 530 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.