Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation · Minnesota

Twin Cities

Roseville, MN · ~194 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Cities runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation workplace, earning a grade D.

Twin Cities: 5.8 TCR = 152% of Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Cities safety composite

Twin Cities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2024

Twin Cities injury rate improved

Twin Cities's TCR fell 5.6 from 8.9 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 152% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/24
  • PHOTO Ute, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ute, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Twin Cities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Cities averages 5.8 TCR (152% of the Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Cities TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Twin Cities falls in its industry

698 Building, residential, additio establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 24 Building, residential, additio employers in Minnesota.

Twin Cities (194 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Cities
Twin Cities (194 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Twin Cities has more employees than the Building, residential, addition, alterat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.6 10 0 0
2023 6.3 4.5 14 0 0
2022 4.3 2.4 9 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 10 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 6 0 0
2019 10.2 5.7 16 0 0
2018 3.6 2.9 5 0 0
2017 8.9 8.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · MN · Roseville

698 Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ute, Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Office 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Restored Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Payne|Bouchier Inc 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 33 HSC 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reviva - Corporate office and Diesel Production 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZF Off-Highway Solutions Minnesota Inc. 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milestone AV Technologies Eden Prairie 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard AL Operating Company, LLC DBA Elderwood Assisted Living at Wheatfield 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cincinnati 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyckoff 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas H. Boyd Memorial Hospital 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company, LLC DBA Elderwood at Wheatfield 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Packaging 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Meadows of Allentown 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Castle 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.