Manufacturer of metal building systems · Texas

Tyler Building Systems, L.P.

Tyler, TX · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Manufacturer of metal building systems workplace, earning a grade C.

Tyler Building Systems, L.P.: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Manufacturer of metal building systems BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. safety composite

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. held a steady TCR band

Tyler Building Systems, L.P.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Tyler, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #22/43
  • PHOTO laminators inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: laminators inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tyler Building Systems, L.P. averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Manufacturer of metal building systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Tyler Building Systems, L.P. falls in its industry

393 Manufacturer of metal building establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 43 Manufacturer of metal building employers in Texas.

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tyler Building Systems, L.P.
Tyler Building Systems, L.P. (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Tyler Building Systems, L.P. has fewer employees than the Manufacturer of metal building systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2022 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2021 4.4 1.5 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · TX · Tyler

393 Manufacturer of metal building systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR laminators inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MB-Rome 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBCI Lubbock 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mb Phoenix 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Brazos Hatchery 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiation Detection Company 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Plainview PLA1 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Major Oak Power 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler - CTMF 380 3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381 1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR Topy Precision Mfg. Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR STRAN Technologies IT Services, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lee Building Products (Bardstown) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aati P3 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunoco Transportation Unbranded 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tavares Pediatric Center 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Mechanical Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steenberg Watrud Construction LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.