Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Ohio
UMD Automated Systems, Inc.
Fredericktown, OH · ~71 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.
UMD Automated Systems, Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. safety composite
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
40/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 4.26 per 100 workers
Safer than 40% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 2.23 per 100 workers
Safer than 31% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−4.4
2016→2024
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. injury rate improved
UMD Automated Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.4 from 7.8 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=7.8 · 2017=7.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 333922 · Fredericktown, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind
- DART 2.2 DART
- RANK #29/40
- PHOTO FI
- BOOK 6y book
- INJ 21 inj
- SIZE ~71 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: FI (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
UMD Automated Systems, Inc.
4.3 TCR
- FI
FI
4.3 TCR
- Quickdraft, In
Quickdraft, Inc.
4.2 TCR
- Continental Gl
Continental Global Material Handling LLC Winfield
4.2 TCR
- JM Conveyors
JM Conveyors
4.2 TCR
What this shows UMD Automated Systems, Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=7.4 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3
Where UMD Automated Systems, Inc. falls in its industry
361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishmentsSafer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.
Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 40 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Ohio.
UMD Automated Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7.4 | 4.2 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
333922 · OH · Fredericktown
361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 15 employers in Fredericktown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | FI | 4.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Quickdraft, Inc. | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Continental Global Material Handling LLC Winfield | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | JM Conveyors | 4.2 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | DuPont Pioneer Grand Rapids Production GRA1 | 71 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Rudolph Libbe Inc. - Ford Ohio Assembly Plant, Avon Lake | 71 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | John G. Johnson Construction Office | 71 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | R&R Pipeline Inc. | 71 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Kokosing Construction Company, Inc | 1,237 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Kokosing Industrial, Inc. | 716 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Corman Kokosing Construction Co. | 436 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | FT Precision INC | 323 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Good Samaritan Society St. Martin Village | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | KW Container | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Beaver Falls Tubular Products LLC | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | ComSonics, Inc - CA | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Palm Consulting, LLC. | 71 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Chestnut Health Systems Maryville | 71 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Colonna Brothers, Inc. 2 | 71 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Pittsburgh Mills | 71 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.