Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Arizona

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program

Tucson, AZ · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade D.

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program: 5.5 TCR = 144% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program safety composite

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program: 5.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2022

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program's TCR rose 1.0 from 5.0 in 2021 to 6.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 144% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO The Arc of Alachua C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arc of Alachua County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program averages 5.5 TCR (144% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program TCR series: 2021=5 · 2022=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Arizona.

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program (59 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program
Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program (59 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Unaccompanied Children 879 Benson Program has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.0 4.8 4 1 0
2021 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · AZ · Tucson

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arc of Alachua County 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 481838 114070_OXNARD_ABI 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peshtigo 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 582235 705941_SOUTH AUSTIN OFFICE_ROHD 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Velocity Builders 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE BFL Construction Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ellison-Mills Contracting LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Pipelines 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Sloan Implement-Virden 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0075 John Soules Foods Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun America LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CK2 Contracting, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Independent Eyewear Manufacturing 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0034 West Liberty Foods LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Steel Corp. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landsberg Sacramento 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.