Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · California

Underground Electric Contruction Co

Benicia, CA · ~180 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Underground Electric Contruction Co runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Underground Electric Contruction Co: 1.2 TCR = 43% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Underground Electric Contruction Co safety composite

Underground Electric Contruction Co scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2021

Underground Electric Contruction Co injury rate improved

Underground Electric Contruction Co's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.8 in 2019 to 1.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Benicia, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/147
  • PHOTO Hydaker-Wheatlake - …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydaker-Wheatlake - MI Gas Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Underground Electric Contruction Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Underground Electric Contruction Co averages 1.2 TCR (43% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Underground Electric Contruction Co TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Underground Electric Contruction Co falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 147 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in California.

Underground Electric Contruction Co (180 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Underground Electric Contruction Co
Underground Electric Contruction Co (180 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Underground Electric Contruction Co has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Benicia

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 91 employers in Benicia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake - MI Gas Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Office 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake Pontiac 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDR Construction 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE BALOIAN PACKING CO., INC. 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJ FARM LABOR CONTRACTING, INC OFFICE 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2905-29050002-4148 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing East 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 484 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 111 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bio-Rad Laboratories Benicia Campus 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Underground Construction - Main 625 FTE
NAT-TCR Landsberg Indianapolis 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mclair Sam'S 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR US187: Dallas 407 - SG 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - FMY2 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MLP 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee WI (Sandwich Bros) 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pace Headquarters 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE WFLA Building 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.