Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

University of Minnesota Physicians

Minneapolis, MN · ~3,746 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Minnesota Physicians runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

University of Minnesota Physicians: 0.7 TCR = 19% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Minnesota Physicians safety composite

University of Minnesota Physicians scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

University of Minnesota Physicians held a steady TCR band

University of Minnesota Physicians's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.9 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.9 · 2022=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #10/419
  • PHOTO Borland Groover Hold…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~3,746 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Borland Groover Holdings - Orange Park Endoscopy and Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

University of Minnesota Physicians in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Minnesota Physicians averages 0.7 TCR (19% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Minnesota Physicians TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where University of Minnesota Physicians falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 419 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in Minnesota.

University of Minnesota Physicians (3,746 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Minnesota Physicians
University of Minnesota Physicians (3,746 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

University of Minnesota Physicians has more employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.5 0.2 14 5 0
2021 0.9 0.2 13 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Minneapolis

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Borland Groover Holdings - Orange Park Endoscopy and Clinic 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cotton O'Neil North Fielding Clinic 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chesapeake Correctional Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR McLaren Medical Management Inc - Flint 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lifeworks Services, Inc 3,663 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Memorial Hospital 3,577 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Memorial Health Care 3,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 104374 - SM 101 Managed Lanes CMGC - North Seg 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 30103 Capstone Affiliated Amarilo 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4620 Kennesaw Sheet Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ware - 78 Main Street 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newton Wellesley Hospital 3,740 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - EWR4 3,738 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.