Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Georgia

Utility Lines Construction Services

Forest Park, GA · ~109 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Lines Construction Services runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Utility Lines Construction Services: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Lines Construction Services safety composite

Utility Lines Construction Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Utility Lines Construction Services: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

Utility Lines Construction Services's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Forest Park, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #14/71
  • PHOTO CMS Wireless
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMS Wireless (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Utility Lines Construction Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Lines Construction Services averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Lines Construction Services TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Lines Construction Services falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 71 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Georgia.

Utility Lines Construction Services (109 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Lines Construction Services
Utility Lines Construction Services (109 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Utility Lines Construction Services has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · GA · Forest Park

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 99 employers in Forest Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMS Wireless 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7102106 DUKE Pisgah Ridge 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PraXel Line Services 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Satilla REMC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Atlanta 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Southern LNG 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunny Delight Beverages Company Atlanta 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR BGDC DISTRIBUTION LLC 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR FOREST PARK (GAFPA) 894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Americold 3PL Atlanta 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAFPA - FOREST PARK 774 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal IG -IG Tech Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Manticore Fuels LLC. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DWD International 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vertellus - Indianapolis 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730061-MX 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1571 D&W -Gr. Rapids, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3126 Dan'S South Bismarck 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal IG -Spring Green AG 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.