Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · California

Valley Communications, Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~70 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valley Communications, Inc. runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Valley Communications, Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valley Communications, Inc. safety composite

Valley Communications, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Valley Communications, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 3.71× in 2024

Valley Communications, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #20/548
  • PHOTO City Electric of Pla…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Electric of Plainview, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Valley Communications, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valley Communications, Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valley Communications, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Valley Communications, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 548 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in California.

Valley Communications, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Valley Communications, Inc.
Valley Communications, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Valley Communications, Inc. has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Sacramento

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Electric of Plainview, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KenMor : KenMor - Houston 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 420 CHARLESTON 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transcon Company LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Land Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceballos Ag Services, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRTHN 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Burgaw 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ennis Mat 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-B498 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metairie Facility 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roof Check INC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tolleson Distribution Center 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Central - Syracuse 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ritter Plumbing Co. Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.