Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Ventana USA Building II

Export, PA · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ventana USA Building II runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ventana USA Building II: 5.9 TCR = 180% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ventana USA Building II safety composite

Ventana USA Building II scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ventana USA Building II: 11.3 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Ventana USA Building II's TCR rose 3.4 from 11.3 in 2016 to 14.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Export, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 180% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #135/183
  • PHOTO MasterMold LLC Johns…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MasterMold LLC Johnson Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ventana USA Building II in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ventana USA Building II averages 5.9 TCR (180% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ventana USA Building II TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=4 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Ventana USA Building II falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 183 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in Pennsylvania.

Ventana USA Building II (24 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ventana USA Building II
Ventana USA Building II (24 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ventana USA Building II has fewer employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 4.9 2 1 0
2023 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.3 11.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · PA · Export

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 34 employers in Export, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MasterMold LLC Johnson Creek 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8373_19061 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solid Surface Craftsman, Inc. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Heights Mushrooms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynesburg PA 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric Power LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prism Response, LLC 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dormont Manufacturing Company 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #0032 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Location 158 FTE
NAT-TCR Park West Plaza 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trejo Labor Service, LLC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MasterMold LLC Johnson Creek 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Drywall, Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE RET-SWN Store 23 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE RET-SSH Store 28 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Municipal Group 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE RET-SED Store 19 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.