Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers · Connecticut

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe

Monroe, CT · ~187 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe: 1.6 TCR = 72% of Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe safety composite

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2019→2022

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe injury rate improved

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.2 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423710 · Monroe, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Orlando
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orlando (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe averages 1.6 TCR (72% of the Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe falls in its industry

449 Hardware (except motor vehicle establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Hardware (except motor vehicle employers in Connecticut.

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe (187 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe
Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe (187 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. Monroe has more employees than the Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423710 · CT · Monroe

449 Hardware (except motor vehicle) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 43 employers in Monroe, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orlando 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYAL1 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Packaging/ IHSU 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skyline Door & Hardware, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Light Sources, Incorporated 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE FuelCell Energy 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaman Air Vehicles 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glastonbury Operations 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR MONROE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biomerics NLE-CT 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Church Hill Classics 138 FTE
NAT-TCR Keystone Concrete Placement/Keystone Sitework/Stewart Builders Houston 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Axalta Coating Systems - Orrville 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCue Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 728 Zimmerman Elementary 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truck Accessories Group Midwest 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Atlanta GA 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Azalea Trace 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03165 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.