Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles on chassis of own manufacture · Indiana

Vuteq Operations Support Center

Princeton, IN · ~81 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vuteq Operations Support Center runs at 434% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade F.

Vuteq Operations Support Center: 14.3 TCR = 434% of Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vuteq Operations Support Center safety composite

Vuteq Operations Support Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vuteq Operations Support Center: 0.0 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 41.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Vuteq Operations Support Center's TCR rose 10.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 10.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 41.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336112 · Princeton, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 434% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Kansas City Assembly
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kansas City Assembly (1.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Vuteq Operations Support Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vuteq Operations Support Center averages 14.3 TCR (434% of the Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vuteq Operations Support Center TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=41 · 2022=5 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Vuteq Operations Support Center falls in its industry

34 Assembly plants, sport utility establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Assembly plants, sport utility employers in Indiana.

Vuteq Operations Support Center (81 employees, TCR 14.3) among 21 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 4,257 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 22 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vuteq Operations Support Center
Vuteq Operations Support Center (81 employees, TCR 14.3) among 21 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 4,257 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Vuteq Operations Support Center has fewer employees than the Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.2 9.3 10 1 0
2023 15.4 14.3 14 0 0
2022 5.0 4.2 6 0 0
2021 41.0 33.6 32 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336112 · IN · Princeton

34 Assembly plants, sport utility vehicles on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 57 employers in Princeton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kansas City Assembly 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AM General, LLC 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GM Arlington Assembly 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aleph Group Inc 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jenacre Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newton County Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana American Water-Northwest District Service Center 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alva Electric Inc 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg Indiana, Inc 7,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Boshoku Indiana 1,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Boshoku 1,069 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1783 380 FTE
NAT-TCR Lynx Logistics, LLC 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonded Fibers Midwest, Inc. 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Tire Commercial & Off-Road #12 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Commons at Union Ranch 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Erection 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Terminal 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robert Gordon Industries LTD 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit International Holding 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.