Sewage treatment plants or facilities · California

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory

Carson, CA · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sewage treatment plants or facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory safety composite

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2023 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Carson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #7/74
  • PHOTO Douglas Project
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Douglas Project (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory falls in its industry

400 Sewage treatment plants or fac establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 74 Sewage treatment plants or fac employers in California.

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory (64 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory
Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory (64 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Laboratory has more employees than the Sewage treatment plants or facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 0 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Carson

400 Sewage treatment plants or facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in Carson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Douglas Project 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin (Operations & HOA) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scranton Wastewater Treatment Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renewable Water Resources 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Carson 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMPAM Parks Mechanical 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carson 755 FTE
NAT-TCR Eagan Packaged Gas Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #24 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CFS 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S03542 - WM of Dothan 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Steele Rubber Products Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Technologies HQ 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFFV 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1136 NW El Paso 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.