Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · California

Washington Ornamental Iron Works

Gardena, CA · ~212 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Washington Ornamental Iron Works runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Washington Ornamental Iron Works: 5.3 TCR = 188% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Washington Ornamental Iron Works safety composite

Washington Ornamental Iron Works scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Washington Ornamental Iron Works injury rate improved

Washington Ornamental Iron Works's TCR fell 2.3 from 5.1 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Gardena, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 188% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #58/96
  • PHOTO C.E. TOLAND & SON
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C.E. TOLAND & SON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Washington Ornamental Iron Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Washington Ornamental Iron Works averages 5.3 TCR (188% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Washington Ornamental Iron Works TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Washington Ornamental Iron Works falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 96 Structural steel erecting or i employers in California.

Washington Ornamental Iron Works (212 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Washington Ornamental Iron Works
Washington Ornamental Iron Works (212 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Washington Ornamental Iron Works has more employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.9 6 0 0
2023 4.6 2.5 11 0 0
2022 6.6 5.3 15 0 0
2021 4.2 2.7 11 0 0
2020 5.6 4.1 15 0 0
2019 6.5 4.7 17 1 0
2018 6.7 3.1 15 2 0
2017 5.1 1.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Gardena

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 223 employers in Gardena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C.E. TOLAND & SON 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinsley Steel 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Construction 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waubonsee Development 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANTA CLARA FARMS LLC 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mecca Location 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Harvesting 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. - Corona North & South 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 602 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-030 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR GARDENA HUB (CAGAR) 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAGAR - GARDENA HUB 794 FTE
NAT-TCR 10193 Pembroke Pines 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1180 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UAP Company 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert Bosch LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Polar Walcott St 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10153 Bellevue 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10276 Schaumburg 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.