CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING · Florida

Water Proofing

Florida City, FL · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Water Proofing runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING workplace, earning a grade C.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
5.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
0
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Water Proofing's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.0 to the CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING BLS benchmark of 5.8 (0% of benchmark) across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Water Proofing's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.

-202468 2016201720182021 05.8 Industry benchmarkWater Proofing TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493190.

Where Water Proofing falls in its industry

557 CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING employers in Florida.

Trend analysis for Water Proofing

Between 2016 and 2021, Water Proofing's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 0.0, a spread of 0.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 4 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 4 reporting years, Water Proofing recorded 0 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 4-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 0 injuries shown on this page for Water Proofing are sourced from its own 4 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493190 - CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 14,921 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Water Proofing (this establishment) 0.00 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg
Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) industry avg 5.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 493190
Florida state avg (all industries) 4.57 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Water Proofing to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Water Proofing's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 0% of the CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING benchmark, Water Proofing reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Water Proofing's safety grade?
Water Proofing has a safety grade of C (Average Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 5.8 for CONCRETE FORMS-RECONDITIONING AND LEASING.
How many injuries has Water Proofing reported?
Water Proofing has reported 0 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 4 years of OSHA data (2021, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Florida, and by nearby establishments in Florida City - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~0.0)

Similar size (~22 workers)

Nearby in Florida City

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.