Nuclear Electric Power Generation · Tennessee

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP

Spring City, TN · ~101 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade C.

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP safety composite

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP held a steady TCR band

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Spring City, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO R.E. Ginna Nuclear P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP (101 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP
Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP (101 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · TN · Spring City

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 7 employers in Spring City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE J A Street and Associates 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blount Excavating 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAKEWAY CONTAINER, INC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caraustar Kingston Springs Carton Plant 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Maintenance 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huber Engineered Woods LLC 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR LP Spring City, LLC 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stone Trucking Laredo 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nuvectra - Plano 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koko Marina Brewpub 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Statesboro (Gasta) 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.