Electric power generation, nuclear · Tennessee

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP

Spring City, TN · ~169 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade C.

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP safety composite

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP held a steady TCR band

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Spring City, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO R.E. Ginna Nuclear P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP (169 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP
United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP (169 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

United TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station SGRP has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · TN · Spring City

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 7 employers in Spring City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baker's Construction Services Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2134 Gallatin Fullfillment 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCL Label Memphis 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueScope Buildings North America Jackson 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Maintenance 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huber Engineered Woods LLC 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watts Bar Nuclear Gnerating Station _SGRP 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR LP Spring City, LLC 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden's Foundry & Machine 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Living Senior Campus 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Northampton 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.