Telecommunications carriers, wired · Washington

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard

Port Orchard, WA · ~63 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard runs at 499% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard: 3.5 TCR = 499% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard safety composite

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard: 3.1 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2024

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard's TCR rose 0.8 from 3.1 in 2021 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Port Orchard, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 499% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO LN Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LN Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard averages 3.5 TCR (499% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard TCR series: 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 0.7

Where Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Washington.

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard (63 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard
Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard (63 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 3.1 1.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · WA · Port Orchard

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 49 employers in Port Orchard, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LN Plant 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TUSTCA70 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wave Division Holdings LLC Concord 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTCO Communications 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Watson's Greenhouse 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE John I Haas Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE George DeRuyter & Sons Dairy 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manke Lumber Company Inc. - Shelton 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2325 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2325 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00655 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Veterans Home 288 FTE
NAT-TCR Portland Forge - Portland, IN 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Federated Co-ops, Inc. - St Cloud Cenex 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Polo Grounds Towers 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palfinger US, American Roll Off 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ilch - Ams 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE T and T Industries, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8010506 Oliver Rubber Company 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.